Prisión preventiva y valoración de elementos de convicción, en el distrito judicial de Ica, 2022
Fecha
2025
Autores
Asesor
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga
Resumen
El estudio buscó Determinar la relación entre la prisión preventiva y la valoración de elementos
de convicción, en el Distrito Judicial de Ica, 2022. Igualmente, correspondió a un estudio básico,
donde se contó con un enfoque cuantitativo, así como con un nivel correlacional, diseño no
experimental, teniendo una muestra de 10 abogados y 10 fiscales, aplicando la técnica encuesta.
Del mismo modo, los resultados señalaron que el 75.0% de los profesionales de derecho calificó
la suficiencia probatoria en nivel medio y el 15.0% en bajo nivel, mientras que, el 75.0% valoró
en nivel medio la valoración de elementos de convicción y el 20.0% en bajo nivel. Además, se
determinó que la suficiencia probatoria se relacionó significativamente frente a la valoración de
los elementos de convicción con una sigma de 0.000 y con un coeficiente de 0.507 mostraron una
correlación positiva media, además, se corroboró que el peligro de fuga se relacionó
significativamente frente a la valoración de los elementos de convicción con una sigma de 0.000
y con un coeficiente de 0.621 mostraron una correlación positiva considerable. Concluyendo que,
la prisión preventiva se relacionó significativamente frente a la valoración de los elementos de
convicción mediante una sigma de 0.000, de igual forma, evidenciaron una correlación positiva
muy fuerte con un coeficiente de 0.811.
The study sought to determine the relationship between pretrial detention and the evaluation of elements of conviction in the Judicial District of Ica, 2022. It also corresponded to a basic study, with a quantitative approach, as well as a correlational level, non-experimental design, with a sample of 10 lawyers and 10 prosecutors, applying the survey technique. The results showed that 75.0% of the legal professionals rated the evidentiary sufficiency at a medium level and 15.0% at a low level, while 75.0% rated the evaluation of the elements of conviction at a medium level and 20.0% at a low level. In addition, it was determined that the sufficiency of evidence was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000 and with a coefficient of 0.507 showed a medium positive correlation, in addition, it was corroborated that the danger of flight was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000 and with a coefficient of 0.621 showed a considerable positive correlation. In conclusion, pretrial detention was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000, and also showed a very strong positive correlation with a coefficient of 0.811.
The study sought to determine the relationship between pretrial detention and the evaluation of elements of conviction in the Judicial District of Ica, 2022. It also corresponded to a basic study, with a quantitative approach, as well as a correlational level, non-experimental design, with a sample of 10 lawyers and 10 prosecutors, applying the survey technique. The results showed that 75.0% of the legal professionals rated the evidentiary sufficiency at a medium level and 15.0% at a low level, while 75.0% rated the evaluation of the elements of conviction at a medium level and 20.0% at a low level. In addition, it was determined that the sufficiency of evidence was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000 and with a coefficient of 0.507 showed a medium positive correlation, in addition, it was corroborated that the danger of flight was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000 and with a coefficient of 0.621 showed a considerable positive correlation. In conclusion, pretrial detention was significantly related to the evaluation of the elements of conviction with a sigma of 0.000, and also showed a very strong positive correlation with a coefficient of 0.811.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Prisión preventiva, Delito, Peligro de fuga, Suficiencia probatoria, Pretrial detention