Apoyo Familiar y Manejo del Estrés en Enfermeros del Hospital Regional de Ica, 2024

Abstract

La presente investigación tuvo como Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre el apoyo familiar y el manejo del estrés en enfermeros del Hospital Regional de Ica, 2024, Material y Métodos: Estudio cuantitativo, correlacional y diseño no experimental. Muestreo probabilístico de 177 enfermeras/os. Se utilizó cuestionarios validados a nivel nacional adaptados a la realidad, reportando un coeficiente de Alfa de Cronbach 0.880 (apoyo familiar) y 0.851 (manejo del estrés), presentando 35 preguntas de opción múltiple. Resultados: Señalaron que el apoyo familiar y el manejo del estrés mostraron una correlación significativa, con un coeficiente de 0.733 y una sigma menor a 0.050. El nivel de apoyo familiar presentó valores intermedios, en dimensiones: El 68.40% en apoyo general, 66.70% apoyo afectivo y emocional, 70.10% apoyo instrumental y 61.00% en apoyo interactivo. En cuanto al manejo del estrés, este alcanzó un nivel medio con un 67.80%, distribuyéndose en un 66.70% a nivel fisiológico, 68.40% en el cognitivo-emocional y 68.90% en el conductual, lo cual reflejó una adecuada gestión de las demandas emocionales. Conclusiones: Que el respaldo familiar actúa como un amortiguador fundamental frente a las tensiones laborales, al ofrecer soporte en múltiples dimensiones de la vida emocional y práctica. Este sistema permite a los individuos responder de manera equilibrada y funcional ante desafíos complejos, contribuyendo a una mejor regulación interna y a la capacidad de mantenerse operativos y controlados en su desempeño cotidiano.The present research had the following objectives: To determine the relationship between family support and stress management in nurses at the Regional Hospital of Ica, 2024, Material and Methods: Quantitative, descriptive, correlational study and non-experimental design. Probability sampling of 177 nurses. Nationally validated questionnaires adapted to reality were used, reporting a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.880 (family support) and 0.851 (stress management), presenting 35 multiple-choice questions. Results: They indicated that family support and stress management showed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.733 and a sigma of less than 0.050. The level of family support presented intermediate values, in dimensions: 68.40% in general support, 66.70% affective and emotional support, 70.10% instrumental support and 61.00% in interactive support. Regarding stress management, it reached a medium level with 67.80%, distributed in 66.70% at the physiological level, 68.40% in the cognitive-emotional level and 68.90% in the behavioral, which reflected an adequate management of emotional demands. Results: They indicated that family support and stress management showed a significant correlation, with a coefficient of 0.733 and a sigma of less than 0.050. The level of family support presented intermediate values, in dimensions: 68.40% in general support, 66.70% affective and emotional support, 70.10% instrumental support and 61.00% in interactive support. Regarding stress management, it reached a medium level with 67.80%, distributed in 66.70% at the physiological level, 68.40% in the cognitive-emotional level and 68.90% in the behavioral, which reflected an adequate management of emotional demands. Conclusions: That family support acts as a fundamental buffer against work tensions, by offering support in multiple dimensions of emotional and practical life. This system allows individuals to respond in a balanced and functional way to complex challenges, contributing to better internal regulation and the ability to remain operational and controlled in their daily performance.